For operators

Every workflow that starts with an engineering document gets faster, more accurate, and auditable.

From MTO for the next turnaround to LDAR component inventory for your next refinery audit, the work that reads your P&IDs is Armeta's work. The engineering team that used to spend days reading drawings spends hours reviewing structured output instead.

Book a demo Start with a free document audit

The operator problem

Your plant runs on engineering documents no software can read.

The P&ID, the piping isometric, the line list — these are the documents that define how your facility is built, operated, and maintained. They sit in siloed systems and formats — CAD exports here, scanned PDFs there, spreadsheets somewhere else. Every Management of Change requires updating them. Every PHA revalidation requires reading them. Every LDAR survey requires tracing components back to them.

And every one of these workflows starts with an engineer re-reading the drawing by hand. Every time.

Six decades of CAD software has been built to create P&IDs. None of it reads the archive you already have. Every downstream workflow — compliance, procurement, safety, turnaround — pays the cost of manual extraction, again, every time.

Four workflows

Four operator workflows, one extraction engine.

MTO for turnarounds and revamps

Today

Manual extraction from PDF P&IDs takes 8 to 24 hours per drawing, depending on complexity. Cross-drawing connectivity is missed regularly. The typical result: 5 to 15 percent overpurchase on procurement — direct cost for a cost the MTO was supposed to control.

With Armeta

Structured component list from P&IDs, fabrication BOMs from piping isometrics, and line-level attribute data from line lists — delivered in hours, not weeks. Cross-document contextualization means every item on the MTO traces back to the process schematic, the physical routing, and the engineering data table. Accuracy and preparation time compress together.

Automated MTO extraction workflow

MOC reconciliation

Today

29 CFR 1910.119(l) requires every Management of Change to update Process Safety Information, including P&IDs. In practice: two prints, a red pen, hours of engineer time per MOC. Undocumented field modifications drift into as-built records. MOC is one of OSHA's most frequently cited PSM elements.

With Armeta

Automated, auditable delta between any two revisions of the same drawing. Every change is flagged, structured, and exportable — ready for the MOC package. Engineering time drops; documentation quality rises.

MOC reconciliation workflow

PHA / HAZOP revalidation

Today

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(6) mandates Process Hazard Analysis revalidation at least every five years. EPA RMP parallels apply under 40 CFR Part 68. Step one of every revalidation — confirming P&IDs are current and building the PSI package — is manual. The PSI rebuild typically runs six to twelve months of lead time.

With Armeta

Current, structured P&IDs delivered to the HAZOP team at study kickoff. Revision deltas since the last revalidation are already flagged. PSI preparation time collapses from months to weeks.

PHA revalidation support workflow

LDAR component inventory

Today

Every regulated valve, flange, connector, pump, and compressor under 40 CFR Parts 60, 61, and 63 must trace to a current P&ID. EPA's Leak Detection and Repair: A Best Practices Guide identifies drawing-to-component misalignment as a source of incomplete monitoring. A large US refinery carries more than 70,000 regulated components.

With Armeta

Structured component inventory contextualized across the documents that govern them. P&IDs and piping isometrics provide drawing-traceable identity and physical location context for every regulated component, while line list data carries the material and service attributes needed for regulatory classification. The LDAR database stays aligned with engineering reality, and compliance evidence is document-traceable — every component tied to a specific source document and source region.

LDAR component inventory workflow

The economics

The math works the first time you run it.

A simplified calculation for a typical operator engagement:

These are the direct engineering hours. They do not include MTO overpurchase avoidance (5–15% on brownfield work), HAZOP revalidation cycle time compression, MOC documentation acceleration, or the strategic value of retaining senior engineering knowledge as structured data.

The math

simplified

P&IDs in scope500

Manual engineering per P&ID16 hrs

Loaded engineering cost$120 / hr

Manual cost to process$960,000

Armeta extraction + validation per P&ID0.5 hrs

Result

Armeta cost to process$30,000

Engineering hours reclaimed7,750

Evidence

Deployed today, where your data lives.

Proof

On real operator drawings today.

A US-based operator currently runs Armeta on live production P&IDs. External validation on the record: first place at CERAWeek 2026 Energy Venture Day, Industrial Efficiency and Decarbonization track.

See the full proof page

Deployment

Where your P&IDs already live.

Cloud, on-premise, or private cloud. Deployed with operators today under data residency and air-gap requirements. SOC 2 Type II audit in progress, completing H1 2026.

Security and deployment

Your drawings, your data

Start with ten of your own drawings.

Before any procurement conversation, see Armeta run on your actual P&IDs. Your drawings, your symbol library, your site conventions. A structured report in one engagement.

Book a demo Start with a free document audit